Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 评测：超长电池使用时间，性能更胜 M4 Pro哑光显示屏使其用途更加广泛。 与较小的 MacBook Pro 14-plus 相比，大尺寸 MacBook Pro 16 能更好地发挥Apple M4 Pro SoC 的性能潜力，电池续航时间也更长。同样，如果你经常在明亮的环境中工作，可选的磨砂面板也是一个真正的优势。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 11/15/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 ARM Apple Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt
评语：有了 M4 Pro 和雾面显示屏，MacBook Pro 16 摇身一变成为更好的多媒体笔记本电脑Apple MacBook Pro 16 的 2024 机型再次成为令人印象深刻的多媒体笔记本电脑。与较小的 MacBook Pro 14 相比，16 英寸的机身可以更好地利用新的 M4 Pro SoC，同时排放也更低。Apple ，大大提高了 CPU 和 GPU 的性能，特别是在单核心领域，Apple ，M4 代目前还没有竞争对手。
虽然机箱本身没有任何变化，但整体上有了一系列改进。其中包括迷你 LED 面板的 SDR 亮度得到了提高，同时采用了新的纳米纹理涂层，即哑光显示屏选项。这意味着你可以在超亮的环境中使用 MacBook，而不会受到恼人的反光影响。它的 USB-C 端口现在支持 Thunderbolt 5，新的 1200 万像素摄像头可在视频通话时提供更好的画面，并具有桌面视图等高级功能。不过，你还得忍受没有 Wi-Fi 7 的烦恼。它的电池续航时间一如既往地出色，将 Windows 的直接竞争对手甩在身后。
Test device courtesy of Apple Deutschland
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
它的缺点是缺乏维护选项，并且需要为更多内存/SSD 存储支付巨额附加费。与 Windows 笔记本电脑相比，M4 Pro 的游戏选择仍然有限，不过它的游戏性能普遍非常出色，所有原生 macOS 游戏都能流畅运行。
Pros+ 优质稳定的外壳
+ 色彩准确的亮丽显示屏/可选哑光面板
+ 极高的 HDR 亮度/更高的 SDR 亮度
+ 日常使用时始终极为安静
+ 极高的系统性能
+ M4 Pro 性能大幅提升
+ 超长运行时间
+ 出色的扬声器
+ 最高 128 GB 内存（M4 Max）和 8 TB SSD 存储空间
+ 具有高级功能的 12 百万像素网络摄像头Cons- 持续的 PWM 闪烁和缓慢的响应时间
- 保修期仅为 12 个月
- 几乎没有维护选项
- 内存和固态硬盘存储附加费极高
- 网络摄像头没有 FaceID，拍照/录像时分辨率低
- 无 Wi-Fi 7
价格和供应情况你可以直接在Apple 网站上用 M4 Pro 配置新 MacBook Pro 16。.配备 M4 Pro、48GB 内存和 512GB 固态硬盘的配置可从亚马逊购买，目前售价 2,664 美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightHeightDisplay
1.93%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU ⎘48 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSDAmazon: $2,628.30List Price: 4219€2.1 kg16.8 mm16.20"3456x2234254 PPIMini-LED
2.93.7% v7 (old)Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core ⎘ Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU ⎘18 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $16.61MOSISO Compatible with MacBo...2. $7.95CaseBuy Premium Keyboard Cov...3. $39.99140W Charger for MacBook Pro...List Price: 2999€2.1 kg16.9 mm16.20"3456x2234254 PPIMini-LED
3.83.5%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: $2,250.00List Price: 3239 Euro2 kg20.5 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIIPS LED
4.87.8%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $2,839.00HIDevolution [2024] ASUS Pro...2. $1,649.99ASUS ProArt PX13 (Replace P1...3. $59.99Ruilezyo 200W Charger Compat...List Price: 4000€1.8 kg17.3 mm16.00"3840x2400283 PPIOLED
5.91.7% v7 (old)Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $2,158.16Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16" Lapto...2. $49.91Original New for Lenovo Yoga...3. $2,199.00Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16"" Lapt...List Price: 1900 USD2.1 kg18.3 mm16.00"3200x2000236 PPIIPS
6.88.6% v7 (old)Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $2,991.00Dell XPS 16 9640 16.3" Touch...2. $1,999.00Dell XPS 9640 Laptop (2024) ...3. $2,899.00NewDell XPS 16 9640 Business...2.3 kg18.7 mm16.30"3840x2400139 PPIOLED
7.90.4% v7 (old)Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,186.99SAMSUNG 16" Galaxy Book4 Pro...2. $1,099.00SAMSUNG Galaxy Book4 Pro 360...3. $855.00SAMSUNG Galaxy Book4 Busines...List Price: 2799€1.8 kg17 mm16.00"2880x1800212 PPIOLED
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Table of Contents评语：有了 M4 Pro 和雾面显示屏，MacBook Pro 16 摇身一变成为更好的多媒体笔记本电脑规格外壳和连接显示屏 - 采用哑光表面的微型 LED 显示屏性能 - MBP 16 与功能更强大的 M4 Pro排放与动力Notebookcheck 总评分
Apple 新款 MacBook Pro 16 已亮相，其基本型号已配备了完整配置的 M4 Pro SoC。新款 MBP 16 配有 24GB 内存和 512GB 固态硬盘，售价 2499 美元。我们的测试配置配备了新的可选哑光纳米纹理面板（额外收费 150 美元）以及 48 GB 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘。由于 在内存/固态硬盘方面的巨额附加费用，其价格升至 3649 美元。Apple
规格
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro (MacBook Pro 16 2024 Series)ProcessorApple M4 Pro (14 cores) 14 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, 46 W PL2 / Short Burst, 46 W PL1 / SustainedGraphics adapterApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, 32 W TDPMemory48 GB , LPDDR5x-8533, onboardDisplay16.20 inch 16:10, 3456 x 2234 pixel 254 PPI, Mini-LED, glossy: no, 120 HzStorageApple SSD AP2048Z, 2048 GB , 2007 GB freeConnections3 USB4 40 Gbps, 3 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness SensorNetworkingBroadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 16.8 x 355.7 x 248.1Battery99.6 Wh, 8607 mAh Lithium-IonOperating SystemApple macOS 15 SequoiaCameraWebcam: 12 MP Center StagePrimary Camera: 12 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: 6-speaker system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 140W PSU, 12 Months WarrantyWeight2.128 kg, Power Supply: 344 g
Price4219 EuroAmazon$2,628.30LinksApple homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接与上一代产品相比，新款 MacBook Pro 的外壳完全一样。它没有面临任何质量问题，在稳定性和制造方面是一款令人惊叹的笔记本电脑。不过，除了可以清洁风扇外，它同样没有提供任何维护选项。与银色机型相比，黑色机型对指纹痕迹的收集再次略显敏感。
它的三个 USB-C 端口现在都支持 Thunderbolt 5，网络摄像头现在使用 1200 万像素传感器。不过，使用网络摄像头拍摄的照片分辨率仍然较低（照片为 1,440 x 900，视频最大为 1080p），而且不支持 FaceID。它的 WLAN 模块支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3，但不支持 Wi-Fi 7。我们没有发现传输速率方面的问题。安装的 SD 读卡器速度很快，但插入的卡会伸出机身 1.6 厘米。
输入设备与旧款相同。键盘输入基本舒适，但键程可能会更大一些。触觉触控板一如既往地出色。
尺寸比较
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Dell XPS 16 9640 Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra DIN A4 ❌
左：MagSafe、2 个 USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 5（120 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery）、3.5 毫米音频
右侧SD 读卡器、带 Thunderbolt 5（120 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery）的 USB-C 4.0、HDMI 输出
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores) (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
163.2 MB/s Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
148 MB/s -9%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
127 MB/s -22%Average of class Multimedia (21.1 - 198, n=43, last 2 years)
101 MB/s -38%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
86.1 MB/s -47%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
78.8 MB/s -52%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV Pro V60)
49.6 MB/s -70%maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
254.4 MB/s +6%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores) (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
239.1 MB/s Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
204.3 MB/s -15%Average of class Multimedia (27.4 - 262, n=43, last 2 years)
144.4 MB/s -40%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
90.2 MB/s -62%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV Pro V60)
89.3 MB/s -63%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
87.2 MB/s -64%
NetworkingApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProBroadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1616 (min: 1558) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1591 (min: 1551) MBit/s ∼93%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1433 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1701 (min: 1556) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1234 (min: 810) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1720 (min: 1657) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIMediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1788 (min: 1649) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1699 (min: 1607) MBit/s ∼99%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
737 (min: 581) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
805 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1078 (min: 1020) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1262 (min: 1155) MBit/s ∼73%
Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1580 (min: 1483) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1591 (min: 1476) MBit/s ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1625 (min: 1476) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1715 (min: 1675) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1616 (1558-1664) Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1591 (1551-1635)
21 ∆E11.8 ∆E15.7 ∆E18.8 ∆E14.2 ∆E13.1 ∆E9.8 ∆E12.7 ∆E12.7 ∆E14.1 ∆E9 ∆E7.8 ∆E10.3 ∆E11.2 ∆E17.1 ∆E6.2 ∆E14.3 ∆E16.1 ∆E1.9 ∆E7.5 ∆E14.2 ∆E19.3 ∆E19.2 ∆E8.3 ∆EColorChecker Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro: 12.77 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 21.02 ∆E
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
显示屏 - 采用哑光表面的微型 LED 显示屏子像素阵列
最大 HDR 亮度（1,620 cd/m²）Apple 继续采用我们熟悉的迷你 LED 面板，对角线尺寸为 16.2 英寸，分辨率为 3,456 x 2,234 像素。另一方面，我们的测试设备配备了纳米纹理选项。从主观上看，它的画面只是受到了轻微的负面影响，因为在仔细观察时，浅色区域看起来有点颗粒感--但从正常距离来看，我们没有发现任何问题，而且我们肯定会选择磨砂选项。它的第二项改进是在环境光传感器激活的情况下提高了 SDR 亮度，现在可以达到 1,000 cd/m² 以上（1,063 cd/m²）。
除此以外，MacBook 的显示屏在许多方面仍然是市场上的标杆（黑色值、HDR 亮度高达 1,620 cd/m² 和几乎全白屏幕时的 1,214 cd/m²、HDR 功能）。 MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro的评测，我们在那里对这些方面进行了更详细的介绍。MBP 16 还使用 14.8 kHz 的持续 PWM 闪烁，这对大多数用户来说应该不成问题。持续的 PWM 闪烁使确定屏幕的响应时间变得非常困难，但这适用于所有微型 LED 面板（不仅仅是Apple ）。即使我们的数值看起来很高（尤其是与 OLED 屏幕相比），也不应该高估它们。在日常使用中，你不会注意到任何滞后效应（这也要归功于 120 Hz 下的 ProMotion 技术），很多游戏（如《博德之门 3》或《生化危机村》）也没有问题，但对于速度极快的射击游戏来说，OLED 面板是更好的选择。
608cd/m²615cd/m²617cd/m²618cd/m²632cd/m²623cd/m²602cd/m²617cd/m²615cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 632 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 616.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 95 %Center on Battery: 632 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}88.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.21CCT: 6450 K
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProMini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2", 120 HzLenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEMNG007DA1-9 , IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16", 165 HzAsus ProArt P16 H7606WIATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 HzLenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 3200x2000, 16", 165 HzDell XPS 16 9640SDC4196, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.3", 90 HzSamsung Galaxy Book4 UltraATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 HzApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxMini-LED, 3456x2234, 16", 120 HzDisplay-17%4%-2%-1%-0%-1% Display P3 Coverage (%)99.769.4 -30%99.9 0%95.6 -4%98.3 -1%98.6 -1%99.2 -1% sRGB Coverage (%)10097.6 -2%100 0%99.9 0%100 0%99.9 0% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)88.871.8 -19%99.1 12%86.5 -3%87.8 -1%88.5 0%Response Times74%84%75%98%99%-31% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)43 ?(9.6, 33.4)11.2 ?(5.6, 5.6) 74%1.58 ?(0.84, 0.74) 96%12.4 ?(6.3, 6.1) 71%0.82 ?(0.43, 0.39) 98%0.54 ?(0.29, 0.25) 99%66.9 ?(29.4, 37.5) -56% Response Time Black / White * (ms)41.2 ?(24.5, 16.7)10.6 ?(6.1, 4.5) 74%1.25 ?(0.67, 0.58) 97%8.9 ?(4.8, 4.1) 78%0.85 ?(0.46, 0.39) 98%0.69 ?(0.39, 0.3) 98%43.6 ?(13.6, 30) -6% PWM Frequency (Hz)14880240 ?(52, 93)360 ?(90)240 ?(100)14877 PWM Amplitude * (%)9036 60%Screen-293%-58%-118%-96%-82%-62%Brightness middle (cd/m²)632516 -18%355 -44%404.9 -36%366 -42%390 -38%630 0%Brightness (cd/m²)616505 -18%360 -42%390 -37%367 -40%393 -36%604 -2%Brightness Distribution (%)9589 -6%98 3%91 -4%96 1%98 3%94 -1%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.410.4Colorchecker dE 2000 *0.63.5 -483%1.2 -100%2.42 -303%1.3 -117%1.4 -133%1.2 -100%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *1.28.8 -633%2.6 -117%4.65 -288%3.6 -200%2.7 -125%2.8 -133%Greyscale dE 2000 *0.85.6 -600%1.2 -50%1.1 -38%2.2 -175%2.1 -163%1.9 -138%Gamma2.21 100%2.27 97%2.14 103%2.22 99%2.14 103%2.27 97%2.29 96%CCT6450 101%6071 107%6526 100%6468 100%6680 97%6431 101%6812 95%Contrast (:1)12591012Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *1.20.931Total Average (Program / Settings)-79% /
-151%10% /
-7%-15% /
-51%0% /
-34%6% /
-27%-31% /
-49%* ... smaller is better
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 色彩检查器对 P3面板开箱后的校准非常出色。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对其进行了分析，其灰度和色彩与 P3 参考色彩空间的偏差都很小。P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间完全覆盖，AdobeRGB 覆盖率为 88.8%。
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.5 ms rise↘ 16.7 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.6 ms rise↘ 33.4 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 14880 HzAmplitude: 90 %The display backlight flickers at 14880 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 14880 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8201 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
PWM 闪烁（亮度为 0）
PWM 闪烁（亮度为 25）
PWM 闪烁（亮度为 50）
PWM 闪烁（亮度为 75）
PWM 闪烁（亮度为 100）
在阳光下
室外（阴天）
视角稳定性性能 - MBP 16 与功能更强大的 M4 ProApple MacBook Pro 16 标配 M4 Pro 的全部配置（14 个 CPU 内核、20 个 GPU 内核）以及 24/48 GB 内存。你还可以选择配备 36、64 或 128 GB 内存的两款 M4 Max SoC。
测试条件MBP 16 提供三种能源配置文件：低电量、自动 和高性能。后者仅在 CPU/GPU 综合使用率方面略胜一筹，但风扇的噪音也明显更大（42.3 对 55.6 dB(A)）。我们使用自动模式进行了基准测试和测量。
处理器 - M4 Pro，14 个 CPU 内核在我们的 分析文章中详细介绍过。在完整配置下，它拥有 10 个性能核心和 4 个效率核心。与较小的 MacBook Pro 相同，M4 Pro 的功耗高达 46 瓦，而较大的 MBP 16 在连续负载的情况下可以保持这一数值不变。它的基准测试结果令人印象深刻，在多核测试中，它的表现比较小的 MBP 14 好一些。此外，它的成绩甚至比老款 M3 Max 还要好一些，而 AMD/Intel 的多媒体竞争产品也无法与之匹敌。虽然 AMD 或英特尔各自的 HX 芯片能提供更高的多核性能，但它们通常只安装在游戏笔记本电脑中，而且所需的电量也要大得多。AMD 的 Ryzen 9 7945HX在 55 瓦时速度更快，在 45 瓦时应能提供与之相当的性能，但在任何笔记本电脑中都不会在这些功率限制下运行。目前的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370在 ProArt P16(80 瓦）则速度较慢。
相比之下，M4 代的单核性能没有面临任何竞争，目前市场上还没有更快的同类产品（远远没有）。在电池模式下，其性能完全保持稳定。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core | Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores)
1729 Points Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) (1662 - 1729, n=2)
1696 Points -2%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores)
1662 Points -4%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core
1612 Points -7%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1201 Points -31%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
1059 Points -39%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1001 Points -42%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
999 Points -42%Average of class Multimedia (327 - 2069, n=65, last 2 years)
992 Points -43%Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores)
178 Points Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) (177 - 178, n=2)
177.5 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores)
177 Points -1%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
143 Points -20%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core
139 Points -22%Average of class Multimedia (72.5 - 178, n=47, last 2 years)
122.2 Points -31%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
116 Points -35%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
104 Points -42%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
101.6 Points -43%Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores)
22544 Points 0%Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) (22509 - 22544, n=2)
22527 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores)
22509 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core
21243 Points -6%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
15480 Points -31%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15367 Points -32%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14122 Points -37%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13656 Points -39%Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 25760, n=78, last 2 years)
13646 Points -39%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
12952 Points -42%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
12517 Points -44%Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores)
3927 Points +2%Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) (3836 - 3927, n=2)
3882 Points +1%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores)
3836 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
3138 Points -18%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core
3096 Points -19%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2877 Points -25%Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=74, last 2 years)
2721 Points -29%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2506 Points -35%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
2436 Points -36%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2418 Points -37%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
2389 Points -38%
Cinebench R23 Multi Core23437 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core2290 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core178 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core1729 Points
Help... in comparison
系统性能非晶记忆标记全新 MacBook Pro 16 无论是在日常使用还是在合成基准测试中，速度都非常快。在浏览器测试中，新款 M4 Pro 的表现尤为出色。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total CrossMark / Overall
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (2148 - 2162, n=2)
2155 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
2148 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1977 Points -8%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1848 Points -14%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1811 Points -16%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1794 Points -16%Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2255, n=66, last 2 years)
1752 Points -18%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1740 Points -19%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1708 Points -20%CrossMark / Productivity
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (1980 - 2010, n=2)
1995 Points +1%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
1980 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1782 Points -10%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1750 Points -12%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1717 Points -13%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1659 Points -16%Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2050, n=66, last 2 years)
1656 Points -16%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1630 Points -18%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1611 Points -19%CrossMark / Creativity
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (2590 - 2594, n=2)
2592 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
2590 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
2424 Points -6%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2270 Points -12%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2037 Points -21%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2014 Points -22%Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2795, n=66, last 2 years)
1989 Points -23%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1930 Points -25%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1903 Points -27%CrossMark / Responsiveness
Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1683 Points +7%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
1566 Points Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (1556 - 1566, n=2)
1561 Points 0%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1493 Points -5%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1467 Points -6%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1466 Points -6%Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=66, last 2 years)
1435 Points -8%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1418 Points -9%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1225 Points -22%WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (525 - 545, n=2)
535 Points +2%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
525 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
427 Points -19%Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=69, last 2 years)
327 Points -38%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
298 Points -43%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
293 Points -44%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
285 Points -46%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
283 Points -46%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
281 Points -46%WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (337 - 353, n=2)
345 Points +2%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
337 Points Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 353, n=62, last 2 years)
275 Points -18%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
268 Points -20%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
258 Points -23%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
258 Points -23%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
254 Points -25%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
244 Points -28%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
528 ms * -108%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
512 ms * -101%Average of class Multimedia (254 - 835, n=72, last 2 years)
476 ms * -87%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
439 ms * -73%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
416.4 ms * -64%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
376.2 ms * -48%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
254.3 ms * Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (254 - 255, n=2)
254 ms * -0%* ... smaller is better
存储设备非晶盘标记MacBook Pro 16 的基本机型配备了 512 GB 的固态硬盘存储空间；我们的测试设备安装了 2 TB AP2048Z 变体（+600 美元），首次启动笔记本电脑后可使用其中的 1.96 TB。固态硬盘的性能非常出色。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.M4 Pro 最多可与 4 TB SSD 结合使用；8 TB SSD 只能与快速的 M4 Max 结合使用。
Drive Performance rating | Blackmagic Disk Speed Test Drive Performance rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP8192Z
100 pt Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
88.2 pt Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP2048Z
87.2 pt Average Apple SSD AP2048Z
87.1 pt Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
85.6 pt Average of class Multimedia
75.3 pt Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple SSD AP0512Z
66.3 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple SSD AP0512Z
45.5 pt Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple SSD AP1024Z
43.5 pt Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB ReadApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP8192Z
5665.9 MB/s +5%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
5401.3 MB/s Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
5378.2 MB/s 0%Average Apple SSD AP2048Z (5294 - 5401, n=6)
5366 MB/s -1%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP2048Z
5294.2 MB/s -2%Average of class Multimedia (2877 - 5666, n=10, last 2 years)
4728 MB/s -12%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple SSD AP0512Z
4645.3 MB/s -14%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple SSD AP0512Z
2947.8 MB/s -45%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple SSD AP1024Z
2876.6 MB/s -47% 5GB WriteApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP8192Z
8271 MB/s +23%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
6713.2 MB/s Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP2048Z
6699 MB/s 0%Average Apple SSD AP2048Z (6314 - 6713, n=6)
6572 MB/s -2%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
6313.9 MB/s -6%Average of class Multimedia (2993 - 8271, n=10, last 2 years)
5548 MB/s -17%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple SSD AP0512Z
4192.9 MB/s -38%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple SSD AP0512Z
3217.8 MB/s -52%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple SSD AP1024Z
2992.9 MB/s -55%
图形卡Apple 与快速的 M3 Pro GPU 相比，其性能提高了 30% 以上。不过，与 CPU 相比，M4 Pro 的 GPU 与老款 M3 Max GPU 保持了相当大的距离。在基准测试中，M4 Pro GPU 的性能有时甚至超过了戴尔 XPS 16（60 瓦 TGP）中的GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑，但却落后于 ProArt P16 的 4070 笔记本电脑（105 瓦 TGP）。它的最大优势（尤其是在编辑视频或编码时）是其统一内存。不过，AMD 的 Strix Halo GPU 很可能在未来成为强劲的竞争对手。
另一方面，在游戏方面，情况发生了逆转，专用的GeForce GPU 显示出了优势--甚至在《博德之门 3》等原生 macOS 游戏中也是如此。尽管如此，M4 Pro GPU 仍然表现出色，例如可以轻松显示 1080p 画面和最大细节。我们测试的所有其他游戏都是在 MacBook Pro 上模拟运行的，这当然会牺牲一些性能。尽管如此，它的性能仍然完全稳定，甚至《赛博朋克 2077》也能流畅运行。我们迫不及待地想知道明年原生版本的《赛博朋克》会有怎样的表现。我们还未能在新 MacBook 上测试《GTA V》，因为新的 BattleEye 反作弊软件给我们带来了一些问题。
3DMark | Cinebench 2024 | Geekbench 6.5 | GFXBench 3DMark
Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedAsus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
22868 Points +18%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
19345 Points Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (19284 - 19345, n=2)
19315 Points 0%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17684 Points -9%Average of class Multimedia (3164 - 37434, n=27, last 2 years)
14554 Points -25%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
14545 Points -25%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
11948 Points -38% Steel Nomad Light ScoreAsus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
12189 Points +57%Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (7781 - 7809, n=2)
7795 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
7781 Points Average of class Multimedia (1147 - 13989, n=35, last 2 years)
5640 Points -28%Cinebench 2024 - GPU
Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10457 Points +18%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9916 Points +12%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
9551 Points +8%Average of class Multimedia (3289 - 16546, n=18, last 2 years)
9170 Points +4%Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (8851 - 9085, n=2)
8968 Points +1%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
8851 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
5980 Points -32%Geekbench 6.5
GPU MetalApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
114278 Points Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (113258 - 114278, n=2)
113768 Points 0%Average of class Multimedia (47494 - 179746, n=10, last 2 years)
106862 Points -6%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
78324 Points -31% GPU OpenCLAsus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
111325 Points +60%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
105731 Points +52%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
93132 Points +33%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
77635 Points +11%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
69778 Points Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (69553 - 69778, n=2)
69666 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60815 Points -13%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
50373 Points -28%Average of class Multimedia (9994 - 125058, n=72, last 2 years)
49442 Points -29%GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
125.8 fps Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (125.7 - 125.8, n=2)
125.8 fps 0%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
123.9 fps -2%Average of class Multimedia (36.4 - 232, n=17, last 2 years)
105.9 fps -16%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
97.8 fps -22%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
96.5622 fps -23%2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenAverage Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (284 - 284, n=2)
284 fps 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
283.7 fps Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
282.3 fps 0%Average of class Multimedia (73.3 - 516, n=17, last 2 years)
230 fps -19%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
224.363 fps -21%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
219.7 fps -23%1920x1080 Car Chase OffscreenAverage Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (573 - 575, n=2)
574 fps 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
573.2 fps Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
525.655 fps -8%Average of class Multimedia (174.6 - 941, n=14, last 2 years)
484 fps -16%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
436 fps -24%
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
7781 pointsHelp
Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Total War Pharaoh Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.8 fps +48%Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 fps +33%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
81.3 fps +31%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67.4 (49min, 50.5P0.1, 58.5P1) fps +9%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
62 fps Average of class Multimedia (7.8 - 127.3, n=56, last 2 years)
46.1 fps -26%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
43 fps -31%Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80.7 (65.3min) fps +104%Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65.1 (53.5min) fps +64%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64.3 (53.3min) fps +62%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
58.3 (14.6min) fps +47%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
39.6 fps Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
39.4 (32.4min) fps -1%Average of class Multimedia (6.41 - 98.3, n=68, last 2 years)
35.7 fps -10%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
30.8 fps -22%Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
87 fps Average of class Multimedia (23 - 129, n=11, last 2 years)
75.3 fps -13%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
57 fps -34%Total War Pharaoh - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
58 fps +13%Average of class Multimedia (23.4 - 121, n=16, last 2 years)
55.2 fps +8%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
51.2 fps
lowmed.highultraQHDShadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
204
111
100
87
57
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)
92
78
64
62
43
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)
50.5
48.7
44.5
39.6
24.8
Total War Pharaoh (2023)
65.8
55.4
51.7
51.2
49.3
排放与动力噪音排放配备 M4 Pro 的较大型 MacBook Pro 16 一般比较小型 MacBook Pro 14 更安静，因为其风扇工作速度较低。在我们的测试中，MBP 16 在很长一段时间内都保持静音，我们测得的第一个风扇转速约为 1,400 rpm，几乎听不到风扇的声音，约为 25 dB(A)。在游戏模式下，风扇转速最高达到 33.9 dB(A)（约 2,700 rpm），在压力测试中最高达到 42.3 dB(A)（约 3,600 rpm）。在高性能模式下，噪音明显增大，在约 5,560 rpm 时达到 55.6 dB(A)；在低电量模式下，MacBook 始终保持极度安静（约 1,400 rpm 时为 25.3 dB(A)）。测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。
Noise level
Idle
24 / 24 / 24 dB(A)Load
25.3 / 42.3 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048ZApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512ZLenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFMLenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115NDell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQNoise-6%-24%-29%-18%-16%-9%off / environment * (dB)2424.4 -2%24.7 -3%24.4 -2%23.6 2%24.5 -2%24.2 -1%Idle Minimum * (dB)2424.4 -2%24.7 -3%24.4 -2%23.6 2%24.5 -2%24.2 -1%Idle Average * (dB)2424.4 -2%24.7 -3%27.7 -15%25.4 -6%24.5 -2%24.2 -1%Idle Maximum * (dB)2424.4 -2%24.7 -3%32.3 -35%25.4 -6%27.5 -15%24.2 -1%Load Average * (dB)25.326.9 -6%43.7 -73%42.2 -67%44.2 -75%39.6 -57%37.9 -50%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)33.953.2 -57%53.2 -57%Load Maximum * (dB)42.350.4 -19%53.3 -26%53.2 -26%52.6 -24%49.7 -17%41.7 1%Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)25.148.949.741.7* ... smaller is better
温度除了风扇噪音低之外，较大的 MBP 16 的表面温度也更低。在要求不高的任务中，它的金属外壳能保持超低温，即使在压力测试中，我们也只在某些地方测得最高温度为 43 °C。
在综合 CPU/GPU 负载的压力测试中，大型 MBP 16 内的 M4 Pro 的表现再次优于较小的 14 英寸机型。 较小的 14 英寸机型.M4 Pro SoC 的最大功耗为 74 瓦，随后稳定在 60 瓦左右。在这种情况下，"高性能"模式提供了优势，因为 SoC 在持续负载下的功耗保持在 66 瓦左右。
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø33.7 (28.006-40.843) Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø22.1 (19.969-40.363) Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø29.2 (26.855-34.102) Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø19.8 (18.582-27.706)
Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
42.7 °C41.8 °C41.3 °C 38 °C42.7 °C38 °C 31.4 °C30 °C30.5 °C
Maximum: 42.7 °CAverage: 37.4 °C
42.7 °C42.9 °C43.1 °C39.5 °C42.5 °C39.7 °C31.8 °C34.2 °C32 °C
Maximum: 43.1 °CAverage: 38.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 46.4 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
21.4 °C21.5 °C21.3 °C 21.3 °C21.3 °C21.2 °C 21.1 °C21.2 °C21.1 °C
Maximum: 21.5 °CAverage: 21.3 °C
21 °C21.5 °C21.3 °C21 °C21.3 °C21 °C21.2 °C21.4 °C21.2 °C
Maximum: 21.5 °CAverage: 21.2 °C Power Supply (max.) 33.1 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
41.7 °C41.5 °C41.3 °C 38.8 °C41 °C37.8 °C 32.7 °C30.4 °C31.8 °C
Maximum: 41.7 °CAverage: 37.4 °C
43 °C42.5 °C42.8 °C40.6 °C41 °C39.9 °C32.3 °C34.3 °C32.6 °C
Maximum: 43 °CAverage: 38.8 °C Power Supply (max.) 44.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.7 °C / 90.9 F) and are therefore not hot. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
表面温度应力测试（顶部）
表面温度应力测试（底部）
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPUApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPULenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPUAsus ProArt P16 H7606WIAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPULenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPUDell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPUSamsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPUHeat-1%-16%-26%-19%-9%-2%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)42.738.1 11%50.3 -18%46.9 -10%41 4%39.4 8%38.5 10%Maximum Bottom * (°C)43.137 14%38 12%50.9 -18%40.6 6%36.9 14%41.2 4%Idle Upper Side * (°C)21.524.2 -13%28.3 -32%28.9 -34%30.2 -40%28.2 -31%23.5 -9%Idle Bottom * (°C)21.524.6 -14%27.3 -27%30 -40%31.4 -46%27.4 -27%24.1 -12%* ... smaller is better
发言人MacBook Pro 16 的音响系统再次表现出色，堪称市场上最好的音响系统之一，但竞争对手在这方面并不示弱，有时也能提供类似的效果。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.1% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (4.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.8% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 3% away from median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (8.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 2.1% away from median(+) | bass is linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (5.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 16 9640 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)Compared to same class» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 88% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量我们注意到，在空闲模式下，新款 MacBook Pro 16 与前代产品并无太大差别，但在负载模式下，新款 M4 Pro 功耗的增加就很明显了。我们在游戏时测得的功耗约为 75-85 瓦，而在压力测试中最高可达 138 瓦。在测试过程中，这一数值稳定在 124 瓦，因此所提供的 140 瓦电源装置在体积上已经足够。不过，M4 Max 可能会出现问题，但我们会尽快进行测试。
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048ZApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512ZLenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGENVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02Asus ProArt P16 H7606WINVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFMLenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115NDell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQPower Consumption10%-22%-35%-50%2%22%Idle Minimum * (Watt)4.64.5 2%7.3 -59%8 -74%9.9 -115%7.7 -67%4.8 -4%Idle Average * (Watt)16.816.5 2%12.3 27%9.9 41%16.6 1%10.3 39%7.5 55%Idle Maximum * (Watt)17.116.7 2%17.9 -5%11.6 32%29.2 -71%10.6 38%7.9 54%Load Average * (Watt)76.460.4 21%78.2 -2%76.9 -1%100.9 -32%76.5 -0%79.3 -4%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)83.4123.5 -48%157.7 -89%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)79.3117.7 -48%156.6 -97%Load Maximum * (Watt)138.1102.9 25%167.5 -21%212.6 -54%182.2 -32%138.5 -0%125 9%Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)52.1151.8126.479.2* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.24 / 0.41 WattIdle 4.6 / 16.8 / 17.1 Watt
Load
76.4 / 138.1 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø125.5 (117.5-138.1) Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.74 (7.48-9.31) Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø83.4 (79.7-86)
Power consumption with external monitor
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø17.4 (16.6-23.2) Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø79.1 (77.2-80.6) Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.79 (5.58-6.52) Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø79.3 (77.3-81.3)
运行时间电池信息99.6 Wh 的电池容量没有任何变化，运行时间也是如此。MBP 的成绩令人印象深刻，在 150 cd/m² 的 WLAN 测试中，我们注意到它的续航时间接近 20 小时，而在 SDR 全亮度下，它仍能坚持近 7.5 小时。在 150 cd/m² 的视频测试中，MacBook 甚至运行了超过 24 小时才耗尽电池。在全亮度下播放 HDR 视频时，我们测得的时间为 6.5 小时。在这些运行时间面前，Windows 的直接竞争对手毫无胜算。
使用 140 瓦的电源装置，在设备开机状态下充满电需要 88 分钟。26 分钟后可恢复 50% 的电量，49 分钟后可恢复 80% 的电量，63 分钟后可恢复 90% 的电量。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
19h 38min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
7h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
24h 34min
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro (14 cores), M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, 99.6 WhApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, 99.6 WhLenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGEUltra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 WhAsus ProArt P16 H7606WIRyzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 WhLenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 84 WhDell XPS 16 9640Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.5 WhSamsung Galaxy Book4 UltraUltra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 WhAverage of class Multimedia Battery runtime2%-49%-37%-54%-40%-36%-38%H.264 (h)24.624.7 0%21 -15%16.5 -33%17.9 -27%16.2 ?(8.3 - 24.7, n=37, last 2 years) -34%WiFi v1.3 (h)19.620.1 3%9.9 -49%8.3 -58%9 -54%10.5 -46%10.9 -44%11.6 ?(4.37 - 20.1, n=67, last 2 years) -41%
Notebookcheck 总评分由于采用了 M4 Pro，MacBook Pro 16 2024 的性能得到了显著提升，此外，与较小的 MacBook Pro 14 相比，这款 16 英寸大屏笔记本电脑能更好地利用新的 M4 Pro。它的微型 LED 屏幕仍然是移动领域的典范，并得益于额外的 SDR 亮度和可选的哑光纳米纹理表面。MacBook Pro 16 M4 Pro 排放量低，运行时间长，是市场上最好的多媒体笔记本电脑之一。
Back to the verdict
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
- 11/14/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Chassis89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard92%
Pointing Device100%
Connectivity79 / 80 → 99%
Weight62 / 20-74 → 78%
Battery92 / 95 → 97%
Display95%
Games Performance80 / 88 → 91%
Application Performance96 / 92 → 100%
Temperature89%
Noise90 / 95 → 95%
Audio93%
Camera38 / 75 → 51%
Average75%
93%
Multimedia - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions59.2%Materials50%Packaging100%Power Use85.8%Repairability0%Software Updates50% Total Sustainability Score: 57.5%
More articles related to this deviceApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro (MacBook Pro 16 2024 Series)News•适用于 MacBook Pro 的全新 Fonecyc MegaHub 底座可增加高达 16TB 的固态硬盘存储空间 |News•Apple配备 M4 Max 的 MacBook Pro 16 是最适合视频剪辑的笔记本电脑 |Review•Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max 评测 - M4 Max 是最快的移动处理器之一
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 461 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 636423 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!